.

Harsh Words for La Grange Trustees Who Deny Police Chief New Squad Cars

La Grange trustees vote down spending money already budgeted for new police cars and get harsh feedback from a former trustee for micromanaging. La Grange's police chief says current cars won't last the year and will now be more expensive.

Current trustees at a La Grange Village Board meeting on May 14 got some harsh feedback from a former La Grange trustee after they voted down a request from the Village's chief of police to purchase new patrol cars for officers.

Former trustee Nancy Kenney told some trustees that they needed to remember that La Grange's staff are professionals and not to micromanage them in their needs.

“If you find that you are more often than not voting against the recommendations of staff, you are not being heroes, you are obstructionists,” Kenny said.

Kenny directed her comments toward trustees Michael Horvath, Jim Palermo, Jeff Nowak and Mark Kuchler, who all voted against Chief Michael Holub's request to purchase new squad cars for the village.

Replacement of the village's current patrol cars had been budgeted by trustees in November last year as part of the Equipment Replacement Fund. Holub asked trustees on Monday evening to approve the $155,000 allocated in the fund for the purchase of the new vehicles. The funds would have provided for the purchase of six new Chevy Caprice patrol cars.

Move to Three-Year Purchase Cycle Comes at a Cost

In the past, La Grange has purchased new squad cars on a two-year cycle, Holub told trustees at the meeting. After purchasing new cars in 2009, the village moved to a three-year replacement cycle to contain costs. The switch to a three-year cycle has come at a cost of an additional $15,000 in maintenance repairs for the vehicles in order to keep them operational. Additionally, Holub told trustees, the frequency of the repairs has reduced the department's productivity as one car has been in the repair shop each week with the department losing the vehicle for an average of two days each time.

Trustees Grill Chief

Trustees Palermo and Horvath pressed Holub on whether the village could get an additional year out of the vehicles, why they needed repairs so often and about getting a deeper breakdown of numbers on how long each day the engines were running.

"I'm on board for having reliable cars," Horvath said. "But my question is, what is a reliable car?"

Even though the cars only have an average of 63,000 miles on them, Holub said, the engines are being run for an estimated 20 hours a day and are operated by officers driving back and forth across a small village with many stops and starts, which is more intensive on an engine than highway driving.

President Asperger attempted to clarify what trustees were concerned about, to which Horvath replied that he was questioning whether the village could get an additional year out of the vehicles they already had.

"The answer is no, they will not carry us through the year," Holub replied.

Trustee Mark Langan reminded fellow trustees that the purchase cycle was already extended a year and that they had planned on replacing the vehicles this year and had the money to pay for them.

"We as a board made the decision to purchase cars this year," Langan said to fellow trustees, and asked Holub how many vehicles he had purchased in the past on behalf of police departments.

Holub responded that he would estimate it was well over 100 cars, and did not feel the current cars were safe to keep for another year.

Trustees Request Waiting a Month to Discuss Purchase of Cars, Village Loses Opportunity to Save

Trustees Horvath, Palermo, Nowak and Kuchler suggested that the discussion of whether to purchase new cars wait until after the board discusses

"I fully agree that when doing the budget, new cars were on the purchase list," Kuchler said. "Unfortunately, and some cuts need to be made. It's not my intention to do that this year. I would say all these purchases need to be delayed until we make those cuts."

Kuchler, along with Palermo, Nowak and Horvath, that would have added less than $40 to the average resident's bills this year. The increase would have added an additional $175,000 to the village's budget. Because trustees voted against the increase, La Grange has had to go into deficit spending this year and will have to find a way to fill a $130,000 hole in budget now that will come with increased cuts at the village. Trustees are planning to discuss what cuts to make in June.

Holub warned that if trustees waited until next month to purchase the cars, the village would lose its opportunity purchase them at a reduced rate negotiated by the state. The village would have to wait until next year to get the state bid price again. Holub added that if the village went out to bid on its own, they would end up paying more for the cars this year.

Board Votes No on New Cars, President Asperger 'Concerned' by Result

After nearly 45 minutes of discussion, President Asperger called a vote on the request. The purchase request was voted down 4-3, with trustees Horvath, Palermo, Nowak and Kuchler voting no. Trustees Holder and Langan voted in favor, and later in the meeting also expressed frustration with their fellow trustees for voting against already budgeted items and hampering the village staff's ability to do their jobs.

"I’m very concerned that the board discussion of this issue is couched in a budget analysis, but is without due respect of the considered judgment of expert staff," Asperger said. "Let us not pretend we now better than our professional staff. We need to rely on the persons we hire.”

Mike Schwab May 18, 2012 at 08:34 PM
Obviosly these trustees are not financial business people. Time for them to go!
Mouse May 19, 2012 at 04:11 AM
Chief, in order to get any love from the Village of La Grange, you need to open a restaurant. Then they'll be tripping over each other to just GIVE you $155,000. As a commercial property owner in La Grange I agree with Mike above...time to clean house and Asperger need to go first. She's leading a pack of arrogant but clueless hacks who don't listen to the professionals they hire.
Tom May 19, 2012 at 12:50 PM
I think a car should last 3 years even if that equates to 100K miles. That said, with all the unchecked speeding down LG Rd or 47th St, perhaps we can incentivize the officers to bridge the revenue deficit through more traffic stops. I see a lot of tandem PD car parking, which means engines idling for a 15 min conversation.
Al May 19, 2012 at 02:05 PM
I find it very hard to believe that these police cars, with 63000 miles on them, and 3 years old, can not last another year. Perhaps the police department needs to find a better vehicle maintenance partner?? I'm a resident of La Grange, and an engineer by profession. My personal car is12 years old, with 285,000 miles. I drive it 100 miles a day. I thick a good preventative maintenance program will allow most vehicles to run a long time. Again, I find it hard to believe these cars can't last.
Ed May 19, 2012 at 02:44 PM
I agree with Al above. Also, is a dealership really the most economical repair facility that can be used by the police department?
Ali May 19, 2012 at 02:50 PM
Mouse...it is amazing to me that you use this as a sound board to view very harsh comments, but are not confident enough to sign your name. I am sure the trustees who dedicate so much time would love to remain anonymous just like yourself. Come out of your hole in the wall and be professional about your comments. Ali
Jane May 19, 2012 at 03:08 PM
I'm glad we finally have Trustees who will question spending. Why would a heavy duty police car that comes with a 5 year/100,000 mile warranty fall apart after two years? Western Springs police cars are on a 5 year replacement cycle. The Chief claimed the engines were running 100,000 hours per year. That's impossible. He may be a fine police officer, but I don't think he's a certified mechanic and didn't provide any life cycle costs of justification for his request. As a fleet management professional, I would have denied that request too. It has lots of holes in it.
Jane May 19, 2012 at 03:20 PM
I agree. Any Trustee that thinks a 2 year replacement cycle for a police car is a good business decision, has to go! That's a waste of taxpayer dollars. There is no safety issue or reliability issue if properly maintained. Most suburban fleets are on a 4 to 5 year cycle.
Matthew Hendrickson (Editor) May 19, 2012 at 05:45 PM
Why Asperger, Mouse? Several time recently she's broken a tied vote to side with the professionals?
Beth May 19, 2012 at 07:45 PM
With respect to your opinions, I'm curious as to which of you actually attended or viewed this Trustee meeting on TV. You seem very sure of yourselves and have expressed strong opinions so I'm guessing that you reviewed the reports and research that supports the need for new vehicles. As with many things, the right thing to do is not as always as obvious as it appears. I support the Chief and the staff in their decision to purchase new cars because I happen to know that the research that lead to this decision was well founded and with cost savings in mind. I love this town and live here because of all of the things that make it great; beautiful homes, schools, entertainment and safety. I take tremendous pride in this town and I realize that all of this comes with a price. I am glad that the trustees question this request and all requests, but the time for this line of questions was LAST YEAR when they approved the purchase for this year's budget.
Terry May 19, 2012 at 08:07 PM
The Village has a $130,000 budget deficit and currently no way to overcome it. The 4 trustees are right to question large purchases and delay these if necessary until the deficit is overcome. I support their decision and I'm pleased they have the courage to represent the best interests of the taxpayers.
Jane May 19, 2012 at 10:51 PM
We all love the town. We just want sound decisions. I read the Village staff report. There is no financial analysis in it to support the request for new cars or a two year replacement cycle. Why can't cars that are 3 years old and properly maintained last another year? I applaud the Trustees who are not simply rubber stamping spending requests in this economy.
Ed May 20, 2012 at 01:22 PM
My wife and I watched the meeting twice and couldn't believe what we were seeing and hearing. We are 40 year residents of LG and have attended and spoken at several workshops and meetings over the years. We think Nancy Kenney and Ms. Asperger owe an apology to the four trustees who voted to delay the purchase of the police vehicles. The rhetoric used to admonish the trustees was disgusting and out of line. Responsible individuals do not talk like that and history is replete with those who have tried to surpress opposing points of view and we all know who they are. The fact that the chief of police is required to debate the useful life of an automobile speaks to the fact that the staff dropped the ball on this one. Is the chief an automobile or fleet expert? Not that we have heard. We felt sorry for him trying to justify this expense when he was obviously ill prepared to do so. This was not his job. We love this town also, but the day that dissenting opinions are attacked as they were Monday night is the day LG becomes a less desireable place to live. If we want trustees who just rubber stamp everything why have a board? LG has a monetary hole to fill and tough decisions have to be made. Let's not make them harder with specious comments when a person has an opposing point of view!
Mouse May 20, 2012 at 05:48 PM
Thank you, Ali, for showing how little you value free speech or opinions other than your own.
Mouse May 20, 2012 at 05:51 PM
Matthew, she sets the overall "big picture" for the Village and that picture is getting blurrier and blurrier. That's why. If you owned commercial property in La Grange you might understand.
Mouse May 20, 2012 at 05:56 PM
Oh, and thank you also for the kind words about my concern over all the trash still on the trees back in April. Your demonstration of compassion and understaning of your neighbors' differing opinions regarding how many years these trash bags should pollute our environment is welcome! And finally, my name is as anonymous here as yours.
Maureen May 21, 2012 at 01:07 PM
My applause to the four trustees who voted against this car purchase. It is their job to close the budget deficit and to analyze all possible ways to do that, including questioning the "considered judgement of expert staff." If Asperger suggests that all advice is sound simply because you paid for it, than I would strongly question her judgement. Same goes for Nancy Kenney and her comments on professional staff. We are fortunate to have a board which includes individuals willing to look a little deeper, rather than rubber-stamping recommendations that are unsound.
Bob Brogan May 21, 2012 at 01:39 PM
Thanks to you - Village of La Grange Trustees that voted NO!!!!!! I applaud you for your vote in favor of solid Village fiscal financial management. The LG tax base should not be counted on for max. increases in every conceivable collection body. The current lack of simple financial management and skills required to manage a multi-million dollar enterprise is severely lacking at Village Hall. The current lack of financial aptitude and ability to fulfill the simplest requests for the Trustees and/or private citizens borders on laughable. We have a number of Village Management leaders that lack the basic capabilities of performing and presenting a simple budgetary analysis to justify existing or increased expenditures. Some officials may still be in need of basic spreadsheet / computer skills in today's world. While I have never met Chief Holub, he should be concerned about our under-funded pension liability because we use 1976 level life expectancies in our current funding calculations. In addition, please find electric cars that do not require maintenance in Libertyville while we can reduce costs by purchasing in a much closer proximity. Your residents / constituents are actually living in 2012, so Village leadership please join us in the appropriate decade (not in Ms. Kenney's 1996). Many of us residents are proud of your stand on financial responsibility and accountability. Bob Brogan
John P May 25, 2012 at 11:25 AM
Apparently, the politics of Charleston SC aren't big enough for Nancy K. Who cares what she thinks?

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something